“Busted Deal” Litigation
Between the signing of an M&A transaction and the receipt of regulatory and/or stockholder approvals required to close, one of the parties may seek to back out of the deal. The resulting “busted deal” litigation typically involves one company’s effort to obtain specific performance of the transaction agreement and/or to obtain damages, and the other company’s efforts to avoid the transaction, such as by arguing that the other party to the agreement has suffered a “material adverse effect” as defined in the transaction agreement.
In recent years there have been a flurry of “busted deal” cases, as corporations sought to avoid agreements signed in better economic times. Ross Aronstam & Moritz has been actively involved in many of the most significant busted deal cases of that period.
Articles and Memos
- March 2021The M&A Lawyer
- Voigt v. Metcalf: Delaware Court of Chancery Adopts Innovative Approach to Assessing Allegations of Effective ControlMay 2020The M&A Lawyer
- Verition v. Aruba Networks: Some Answers and Some Questions About Market Efficiency in Delaware CourtsMay 2019The M&A Lawyer